Skip to content

Multiple CI and README.md Improvements#324

Open
Amronos wants to merge 1 commit into
micro-ROS:rollingfrom
Amronos:ci-improvements
Open

Multiple CI and README.md Improvements#324
Amronos wants to merge 1 commit into
micro-ROS:rollingfrom
Amronos:ci-improvements

Conversation

@Amronos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Amronos Amronos commented Feb 26, 2026

This PR makes many improvements to the CI and README.md.
The CI builds are a bit faster now and are run for v5.2, v5.3, and v5.4 of ESP-IDF.
I also removed CI compatibility and mentions of ESP-IDF v4.4, as it's been declared EOL by Espressif for a while now.


This is part 3 of 4 in a stack made with GitButler:

Changes specific to this PR: c9c54a8

@Amronos Amronos changed the title Ci improvements Multiple CI and README.md Improvements Feb 26, 2026
@Amronos

This comment was marked as outdated.

This was referenced Feb 27, 2026
@Amronos Amronos force-pushed the ci-improvements branch 2 times, most recently from fa748f0 to c9c54a8 Compare April 15, 2026 11:40
@Amronos Amronos mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2026
@Narukara Narukara mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2026
@Amronos Amronos force-pushed the ci-improvements branch 3 times, most recently from 198db4d to c1515fd Compare May 7, 2026 00:05
@Amronos Amronos force-pushed the ci-improvements branch 2 times, most recently from 645c046 to 29812fe Compare May 14, 2026 09:13
Also removed CI compatibility and mentions of ESP-IDF v4.4 as it's been
declared EOL by Espressif.
-
@Narukara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#336 All current CI failures are caused by embeddedRTPS. How about we disable it in this PR?

@Narukara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Narukara commented May 19, 2026

Another thing: the humble branch doesn't have int32_publisher_custom_transport_usbcdc example yet. The new CI configuration will test this example on every branch. Should we consider merging #307?

@EugenioCollado
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Another thing: the humble branch doesn't have int32_publisher_custom_transport_usbcdc example yet. Should we consider merging #307?

If you can review it I will merge it as soon as it is approved (@Narukara )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants