pr: uutils pr accepts negative expand tabs argument, GNU pr doesn't

[Devel08]

this PR closes #12766

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 5.9%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 320 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Memory	cp_recursive_deep_tree[(120, 4)]	562.5 KB	615.6 KB	-8.62%
❌	Simulation	ls_recursive_balanced_tree[(6, 4, 15)]	49.6 ms	52.3 ms	-5.2%
❌	Simulation	ls_recursive_wide_tree[(10000, 1000)]	33 ms	34.3 ms	-3.81%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing Devel08:fix-issue-12766 (48cd6d3) with main (4505d51)}

Footnotes

1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/expand/bounded-memory is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/tail/pipe-f is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Congrats! The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now passing!