pr: uutils pr accepts -W 0 and -w 0 while gnu pr rejects it

[Devel08]

This PR resolves #12767

[HackingRepo]

@Devel08 add a test also for -W not just -w alone for we confirm all

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 6%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 321 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Memory	cp_recursive_deep_tree[(120, 4)]	562.5 KB	615.6 KB	-8.62%
❌	Simulation	single_date_now	82.7 µs	85.5 µs	-3.3%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing Devel08:fix-issue-12767 (5a4d17e) with main (c77bf21)²}

Footnotes

1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (3176027) during the generation of this report, so c77bf21 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/retry (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now passing!

[Devel08]

@HackingRepo Oops, I thought that -W and -w are the same, thanks

[cakebaker]

Thanks!