Version 1.1.39#1603
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds an experimental syntax for annotating validation constraints and metadata on embedded Script types. It is written as a means to avoid
Options<Type, Json>wrapping .. as well as to express broader TypeBox library patterns related to option passing (i.e. the last argument rule)The
withkeywordThe
withkeyword is a syntactic shorthand forOptions<Type, Json>that enables options and constraints to be naturally inlined to their associated type. It also serves to more clearly communicate that the right-hand side ofOptions<Type, Json>is a parsed Json value (and not a type expression)The following 3 mechanisms are available for Script annotation assignment.
The
withannotation syntax will be trialed over the 1.1.x revision.