dont destroy type of decorated function

[dkuettel]

Would you accept something in this direction? I've been using line_profiler a bunch and I noticed that the decorated functions fail linting with pyright and the like, because they lose the type.

I didn't setup the tests yet, and we probably have to write it more backwards compatible in case you want it to work with python 3.11 or older.

[Erotemic]

Yes, this makes sense. We are currently targeting 3.10+

[dkuettel]

This syntax should be legal also for python 3.10. It's a simple change, so hopefully linting will go thru without me setting up the test dependencies.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.40%. Comparing base (c2a6a30) to head (4940bca).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #432      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.38%   82.40%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        2254     2256       +2     
  Branches      359      359              
==========================================
+ Hits         1857     1859       +2     
  Misses        300      300              
  Partials       97       97              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
line_profiler/autoprofile/profmod_extractor.py	61.00% <100.00%> (ø)
line_profiler/explicit_profiler.py	52.14% <100.00%> (+0.59%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a5ec7fd...4940bca. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[dkuettel]

fixed a linting error from ty but I don't think that one was related to my changes.

[Erotemic]

Appreciated. You don't have to satisfy the linter if its unrelated to your changes. The ty checker is probably not the best one to use on CI given how much flux it is in, but that's something to address in a different PR.

This LGTM. I'll merge once the main dashboards come back green.