Skip to content

docs: add release notes ocis 8.1.0#172

Merged
DeepDiver1975 merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
add_ocis_8.1.0
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

docs: add release notes ocis 8.1.0#172
DeepDiver1975 merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
add_ocis_8.1.0

Conversation

@mmattel

@mmattel mmattel commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds release notes for ocis 8.1.0

@mmattel mmattel requested a review from kobergj June 1, 2026 13:32
@mmattel mmattel added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 1, 2026
@mmattel mmattel marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2026 09:51
@mmattel mmattel requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2026 09:51
@DeepDiver1975

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Release notes for oCIS 8.1.0 look good — correct version, coherent structure, valid xrefs (build + lint green). One scope point:

  • package-lock.json (whole file): this "docs: add release notes" PR also carries unrelated lockfile churn — package.json is unchanged, so no direct dep was intentionally bumped. The diff is incidental npm install regeneration: transitive/dev bumps (qs 6.14→6.15.3, follow-redirects 1.15.11→1.16.0, minimatch, side-channel, streamx, thread-stream, etc.) plus npm re-hoisting nested node_modules entries to top level.
  • Harmless but out of scope for a docs PR. Suggest dropping the package-lock.json change (git checkout origin/master -- package-lock.json) and keeping this PR to the .adoc, or splitting the lockfile refresh into its own PR so it's reviewed on its own.

Not blocking the content — just flagging the mixed scope.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Signed-off-by: Thomas Müller <1005065+DeepDiver1975@users.noreply.github.com>
@DeepDiver1975 DeepDiver1975 merged commit 674bb0e into master Jul 6, 2026
2 checks passed
@DeepDiver1975 DeepDiver1975 deleted the add_ocis_8.1.0 branch July 6, 2026 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants