Skip to content

chore(docs): update outdated link#56

Open
frewilhelm wants to merge 1 commit into
opendefensecloud:mainfrom
frewilhelm:fix-link
Open

chore(docs): update outdated link#56
frewilhelm wants to merge 1 commit into
opendefensecloud:mainfrom
frewilhelm:fix-link

Conversation

@frewilhelm
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@frewilhelm frewilhelm commented May 28, 2026

What

Fix an outdated link to the OCM documentation that was restructured pointing to ocm v2 instead of legacy ocm.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the OCM credentials tutorial link in the README to reference the correct documentation resource.

Review Change Stack

Signed-off-by: Frederic Wilhelm <frederic.wilhelm@sap.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 39b22a65-40d8-459d-929f-0158d396db0b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 819f6fb and 219c084.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md documentation hyperlink for the OCM credentials tutorial updated to reference the legacy documentation path instead of the non-legacy path.

Changes

Documentation Link Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
OCM credentials tutorial link update
README.md
Documentation hyperlink for "OCM credentials tutorial" changed to point to the legacy docs URL (/legacy/docs/.../credentials-in-an-.ocmconfig-file/) instead of the non-legacy path.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

📚 A link once led to modern doors,
Now turns to legacy folklore,
In the README's gentle care,
Old docs restored with legacy flair! 🐰

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description only contains the 'What' section; 'Why', 'Testing', 'Notes for reviewers', and 'Checklist' sections are missing or incomplete. Complete the description by adding the 'Why', 'Testing', 'Notes for reviewers', and 'Checklist' sections as specified in the template.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore(docs): update outdated link' clearly and concisely describes the main change of updating a documentation link, matching the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026

Actionable comments posted: 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant