docs(user_manual): cleanup prose and RST style in access_webdav.rst#14869
Open
Copilot wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
docs(user_manual): cleanup prose and RST style in access_webdav.rst#14869Copilot wants to merge 6 commits into
access_webdav.rst#14869Copilot wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/nextcloud/documentation/sessions/2c1f4cf0-01aa-4de3-94e3-2d687cf5d98a Co-authored-by: skjnldsv <14975046+skjnldsv@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 4004be2. Co-authored-by: skjnldsv <14975046+skjnldsv@users.noreply.github.com>
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/nextcloud/documentation/sessions/2c1f4cf0-01aa-4de3-94e3-2d687cf5d98a Co-authored-by: skjnldsv <14975046+skjnldsv@users.noreply.github.com>
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/nextcloud/documentation/sessions/2c1f4cf0-01aa-4de3-94e3-2d687cf5d98a Co-authored-by: skjnldsv <14975046+skjnldsv@users.noreply.github.com>
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/nextcloud/documentation/sessions/2c1f4cf0-01aa-4de3-94e3-2d687cf5d98a Co-authored-by: skjnldsv <14975046+skjnldsv@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Cleanup prose and style in access_webdav.rst
docs(user_manual): cleanup prose and RST style in May 16, 2026
access_webdav.rst
skjnldsv
approved these changes
May 16, 2026
Contributor
📖 Documentation Preview📄 1 changed documentation pageLast updated: Sat, 16 May 2026 05:21:45 GMT |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
☑️ Resolves
Small docs-only cleanup pass for
user_manual/files/access_webdav.rstto improve prose, grammar, and style-guide alignment without changing documented behavior.Scope
user_manual/files/access_webdav.rstonly.Prose and style cleanup
RST consistency
Representative edit
🖼️ Screenshots
✅ Checklist
codespellor similar and addressed any spelling issuesOriginal prompt
Create a small documentation-only pull request in
nextcloud/documentationthat performs a prose, syntax, and style-guide cleanup pass on this remaining file inuser_manual/files:user_manual/files/access_webdav.rstFollow the repository style guide in
style_guide.rst, especially:Scope constraints:
Please create a PR with a concise summary of the style/prose cleanup.
The following is the prior conversation context from the user's chat exploration (may be truncated):
Assistant: Yes — the root
user_manualfiles are a very sensible scope.That’s probably the safest “reasonable-sized” pass because it gives you:
The obvious set is:
user_manual/activity.rstuser_manual/session_management.rstuser_manual/universal_access.rstuser_manual/user_2fa.rstuser_manual/userpreferences.rstuser_manual/webinterface.rstI’d treat those as a nice compact batch and leave out:
index.rstcontents.rstdesktop/,files/,groupware/,talk/Why this is a good target:
If you want to keep it even tighter, I’d start with just 3–4 files:
activity.rstsession_management.rstuser_2fa.rstuserpreferences.rstThat feels very PR-friendly.
If you want, I can now:
User: A bit more that 3 files. How many are in the root ?
Assistant: There are 8 prose/content
.rstfiles at the root ofuser_manualif you exclude the index/navigation/build files:activity.rstsession_management.rstuniversal_access.rstuser_2fa.rstuserpreferences.rstwebinterface.rstActually, from what I can see, that list is 6 root content files.
Other root
.rstfiles there are structural rather than prose-pass targets:contents.rstindex.rstSo the root breaks down like this:
If you want “a bit more than 3 files,” then doing all 6 root content files seems like a very reasonable scope.
User: Let's do them
Assistant: Sounds good — all 6 root content files in
user_manualis a solid, manageable pass.That scope is:
user_manual/activity.rstuser_manual/session_management.rstuser_manual/universal_access.rstuser_manual/user_2fa.rstuser_manual/userpreferences.rstuser_manual/webinterface.rstIf you want me to open a PR for that pass, say so and I can do it.
If you want, I can also help first by:
User: Implement this
Assistant: I’ve started the PR creation flow for that focused docs pass and we’re currently waiting for your response to the confirmation dialog to continue.
Assistant: I’ve started creating the pull request for prose, syntax, and style-guide improvements to the six root
user_manualpages.You can track the progress of the task directly. Once completed, I’ll let you know and provide the details of the pull request.
User: Now files, let's see how that would work
Assistant: For a similarly manageable pass,
user_manual/files/could work well — but I’d still want to keep it narrowed.My suggestion would be to do it in one slice of that folder, not the entire subtree at once.
Good options:
.rstfiles directly underuser_manual/files/, excluding deeper subfolders if there are manyThat keeps the pattern consistent with what we just did:
If you want, I can inspect
user_manual/files/and suggest:This pull request was created from Copilot chat.