⚡ Optimize directory copy with EnumerateFiles and EnumerateDirectories#13
⚡ Optimize directory copy with EnumerateFiles and EnumerateDirectories#13mleem97 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: The optimization replaces
Directory.GetDirectorieswithDirectory.EnumerateDirectoriesandDirectory.GetFileswithDirectory.EnumerateFilesin theCopyDirectoryRecursivemethod ofModsFolderSyncService.🎯 Why: The performance problem it solves is that
GetDirectoriesandGetFilesallocate an array for all items in memory before returning them, which incurs high memory allocations and CPU time. Using theEnumerateequivalents iterates over the collection lazily, drastically reducing memory footprint and improving execution time, particularly for directories with many files.📊 Measured Improvement:
I benchmarked copying a directory with 10,000 files (100 subdirectories with 100 files each).
PR created automatically by Jules for task 971256758161556819 started by @mleem97