You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
⚠️ Breaking Change: LEFT JOIN → INNER JOIN on customer_orders
This is the most significant risk in this diff. Switching to an INNER JOIN will silently drop any customer who has no orders. Depending on data, this could mean:
Customers who signed up but never placed an order are excluded from the output.
number_of_orders, first_order, most_recent_order, and customer_lifetime_value previously returned NULL for these customers — they will now disappear entirely from the table.
The existing anomaly monitors (row_count_anomalies, null_count_anomalies on number_of_orders and customer_lifetime_value) will catch this if the row count drops or null rates shift — but only after the model runs. The monitors currently show no_data status, so there's no baseline yet to trigger an alert.
Confirm this is intentional: is the intent to only expose customers with at least one order? If so, the model description ("basic information about a customer") and any downstream consumers may need to be updated to reflect the scope change.
Tests & Monitors
row_count_anomalies, null_count_anomalies (on number_of_orders, customer_lifetime_value): all no_data — no baseline trained yet, so the monitors won't catch a drop on first run.
dimension_anomalies on first_order: last execution was skipped.
Consider running the model in a dev environment and validating row counts against the current production table before merging.
Downstream Impact
No downstream assets. The blast radius is limited to this model only.
Anti-Pattern Warnings
The self_join warnings on customer_orders and customer_payments are likely false positives from the CTEs being referenced in the same final SELECT. Not actionable. The SELECT * warning can be ignored if column selection is intentional.
Risk: 🟠 Medium. The INNER JOIN change is a data-reducing semantic change that could silently exclude customers. No downstream breakage, but the behavior change warrants explicit confirmation before merge.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.