feat(meta): add agent-review rubric and example GitHub Action#1209
feat(meta): add agent-review rubric and example GitHub Action#1209jfindlay wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
* `AGENTS-REVIEW.md`: A vendor-neutral, rubric for a single review pass on a Physlib PR. * `.github/workflows/agent-review.yml`: An example implementation triggered by the `agent-review` label. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply+claude-sonnet@anthropic.com>
|
Thank you for this PR, which will now be reviewed. If you are submitting to ./PhyslibAlpha there will be a lighter review process, If you want to bring attention to this PR, please write a message on this |
| AGENT_REVIEW_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.AGENT_REVIEW_API_KEY }} | ||
| # Configure the model here. Default: a mid-tier model. | ||
| # Escalate to a top-tier model only for large or complex PRs by exception. | ||
| AGENT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sonnet 4.5 is not good enough. I think we should use the top tier models here like opus-4.8 or gpt-5.5
2 participants
AGENTS-REVIEW.md: A vendor-neutral, rubric for a single review pass on a Physlib PR..github/workflows/agent-review.yml: An example implementation triggered by theagent-reviewlabel.