Update Petrinaut toolchain: Vite 8.0.16, tsgo 20260607, React 19.2.7 by kube · Pull Request #8863 · hashintel/hash

kube · 2026-06-12T13:31:00Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Bump vite, vitest, @vitejs/plugin-react, storybook, jsdom, rolldown 1.0.3 (matches vite's internal pin), rolldown-plugin-dts 0.25.2, @rolldown/plugin-babel and @typescript/native-preview across @hashintel/petrinaut, @hashintel/petrinaut-core and @apps/petrinaut-website
typescript 5.9.3 -> 6.0.3 for the petrinaut-core in-browser LSP runtime
react/react-dom 19.2.6 -> 19.2.7 monorepo-wide (required by the root resolutions pin that guarantees a single React copy)
Add explicit @babel/core devDep for the React Compiler babel pass
Extend yarn constraints ignoredDependencies for the new petrinaut-ahead forks (typescript, jsdom, @types/react, tsgo, rolldown-plugin-dts, @rolldown/plugin-babel)
Document why the dts fake-js enforce: "pre" remap must stay: the upstream-recommended oxc.exclude setup (rolldown-plugin-dts#201) emits dts chunks without their local declarations

React Compiler stays on babel-plugin-react-compiler: the Rust port is in oxc 0.135 but not yet shipped in rolldown (rolldown#9671 still draft) nor reachable from stable Vite.

🔗 Related links

...

🚫 Blocked by

...

🔍 What does this change?

...

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing
modifies an npm-publishable library and I have added a changeset file(s)
modifies a Cargo-publishable library and I have amended the version
modifies a Cargo-publishable library, but it is not yet ready to publish
modifies a block that will need publishing via GitHub action once merged
I am unsure / need advice

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change
are in a state where docs changes are not yet required but will be
- this is tracked in: Insert Link Here
require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR
require changes to docs which are not made in this PR
- Provide more detail here
I am unsure / need advice

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph
affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this
I am unsure / need advice

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch / view the deployment
Try X
Confirm that Y

📹 Demo

vercel · 2026-06-12T13:31:07Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 12, 2026 2:18pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 12, 2026 2:18pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 12, 2026 2:18pm

cursor · 2026-06-12T13:31:09Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Medium risk from build-tool upgrades (Vite 8, rolldown-plugin-dts, jsdom 29) and TypeScript 6 in petrinaut-core's LSP bundle; React patch bump is low risk but touches many apps.

Overview
This PR bumps the Petrinaut/Vite 8 toolchain and aligns React across the monorepo.

Petrinaut stack (petrinaut, petrinaut-core, petrinaut-website, refractive): Vite 8.0.16, rolldown 1.0.3, rolldown-plugin-dts 0.25.2, @rolldown/plugin-babel 0.2.3, @vitejs/plugin-react 6.0.2, Storybook 10.4.2, vitest 4.1.8, jsdom 29, and @typescript/native-preview (tsgo) to 20260607.1. petrinaut-core moves typescript to 6.0.3 for the in-browser LSP worker. Explicit @babel/core devDeps support the React Compiler Babel pass.

Monorepo-wide: react / react-dom 19.2.6 → 19.2.7 via root resolutions and workspace package.json files.

Build config: Comments in petrinaut-core, petrinaut, and refractive vite.config.ts explain why the rolldown-plugin-dts fake-js plugin must keep enforce: "pre"—the upstream oxc.exclude approach drops local .d.ts content on Vite 8.

Yarn constraints: yarn.config.cjs adds @types/react, typescript, and jsdom to ignoredDependencies so Petrinaut can stay ahead of the rest of the repo without constraint failures.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c4a6738. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Updates the Petrinaut (and related) frontend toolchain dependency set, aligning the monorepo on React 19.2.7 and moving Petrinaut build/test tooling forward (Vite 8.0.16, Storybook 10.4.2, rolldown 1.0.3, jsdom 29.1.1, and tsgo via @typescript/native-preview 20260607).

Changes:

Bump React / React DOM from 19.2.6 → 19.2.7 across the repo (including root resolutions).
Upgrade Petrinaut / Petrinaut Core / Petrinaut Website toolchain deps (Vite/Vitest, Storybook, rolldown + dts plugin, jsdom, @typescript/native-preview) and add explicit @babel/core for the React Compiler Babel pass.
Extend Yarn constraints ignore list for Petrinaut-ahead dependencies and add comments documenting the continued need for the enforce: "pre" DTS remap in Vite 8.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 17 out of 18 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
yarn.lock	Locks updated versions for React 19.2.7 and the Petrinaut toolchain bumps (Vite/Vitest/Storybook/rolldown/jsdom/TS).
yarn.config.cjs	Extends constraints ignore list for Petrinaut-ahead dependencies (rolldown-plugin-dts, native-preview, @types/react, typescript, jsdom, etc.).
package.json	Updates root `resolutions` for react/react-dom to 19.2.7.
libs/@local/hash-isomorphic-utils/package.json	Bumps React to 19.2.7.
libs/@local/advanced-types/package.json	Bumps React to 19.2.7.
libs/@hashintel/type-editor/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.
libs/@hashintel/query-editor/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.
libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/vite.config.ts	Adds documentation about why the `enforce: "pre"` DTS remap must remain under Vite 8.
libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/package.json	Updates Petrinaut toolchain deps (Vite/Vitest/Storybook/rolldown/jsdom/native-preview) and adds `@babel/core`.
libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/vite.config.ts	Adds documentation about why the `enforce: "pre"` DTS remap must remain under Vite 8.
libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/package.json	Updates Petrinaut Core toolchain deps and bumps TypeScript to 6.0.3 for the in-browser LSP runtime.
libs/@hashintel/ds-components/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.
libs/@hashintel/design-system/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.
libs/@hashintel/block-design-system/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.
libs/@blockprotocol/type-system/typescript/package.json	Bumps React to 19.2.7.
apps/plugin-browser/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.
apps/petrinaut-website/package.json	Updates Petrinaut Website deps (React + Vite/plugin-react/native-preview) and adds `@babel/core`.
apps/hash-frontend/package.json	Bumps React/React DOM to 19.2.7.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

codecov · 2026-06-12T13:34:40Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.15%. Comparing base (bf6fe44) to head (b7f57f6).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8863   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.15%   59.15%           
=======================================
  Files        1346     1346           
  Lines      130117   130117           
  Branches     5883     5883           
=======================================
+ Hits        76975    76976    +1     
+ Misses      52237    52236    -1     
  Partials      905      905

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.39% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.51% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.78% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`79.42% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.05% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-06-12T13:36:46Z

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.18%

⚠️

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	170 ns	140.8 ns	+20.71%
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	215 ns	185.8 ns	+15.7%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing cf/petrinaut-setup-updates-june (c4a6738) with main (dfe8234)}

- Bump vite, @vitejs/plugin-react, storybook, rolldown 1.0.3 (matches vite's internal pin), rolldown-plugin-dts 0.25.2, @rolldown/plugin-babel and @typescript/native-preview across @hashintel/petrinaut, @hashintel/petrinaut-core, @apps/petrinaut-website and @hashintel/refractive; vitest 4.1.8 + jsdom 29 where tests exist - typescript 5.9.3 -> 6.0.3 for the petrinaut-core in-browser LSP runtime - react/react-dom 19.2.6 -> 19.2.7 monorepo-wide (required by the root resolutions pin that guarantees a single React copy) - Add explicit @babel/core devDep for the React Compiler babel pass - yarn constraints: ignore @types/react, typescript and jsdom forks (refractive was aligned instead of ignored for the toolchain packages) - Document why the dts fake-js `enforce: "pre"` remap must stay: the upstream-recommended `oxc.exclude` setup (rolldown-plugin-dts#201) emits dts chunks without their local declarations React Compiler stays on babel-plugin-react-compiler: the Rust port is in oxc 0.135 but not yet shipped in rolldown (rolldown#9671 still draft) nor reachable from stable Vite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

github-actions · 2026-06-12T15:29:31Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.342 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.784 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$58.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 634 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$48.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$301 \mathrm{ms} \pm 932 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$21.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$37.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$37.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$37.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.660 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$98.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 651 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$151 \mathrm{ms} \pm 713 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 634 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 688 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 644 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 753 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 774 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 491 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.933 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 660 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$158 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$603 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.08 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 12, 2026 13:31

graphite-app Bot assigned kube Jun 12, 2026

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of kube June 12, 2026 13:31 View session

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 12, 2026 13:32 View deployment

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 12, 2026 13:35 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 12, 2026 13:42 View deployment

kube force-pushed the cf/petrinaut-setup-updates-june branch from b7f57f6 to c4a6738 Compare June 12, 2026 14:06

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 12, 2026 14:08 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 12, 2026 14:11 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 12, 2026 14:18 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update Petrinaut toolchain: Vite 8.0.16, tsgo 20260607, React 19.2.7#8863

Update Petrinaut toolchain: Vite 8.0.16, tsgo 20260607, React 19.2.7#8863
kube wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cf/petrinaut-setup-updates-june

kube commented Jun 12, 2026

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

kube commented Jun 12, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🚫 Blocked by

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

📹 Demo

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.18%

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

vercel Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading