Skip to content

Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.16#8844

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/turbo-monorepo
Open

Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.16#8844
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/turbo-monorepo

Conversation

@hash-worker

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
npm:turbo (source) 2.6.3 → 2.9.16 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

vercel/turborepo (npm:turbo)

v2.9.16: Turborepo v2.9.16

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.15...v2.9.16

v2.9.15: Turborepo v2.9.15

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.14...v2.9.15

v2.9.14: Turborepo v2.9.14

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This release contains important security fixes.

High:
Low:

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.12...v2.9.14

v2.9.12: Turborepo v2.9.12

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.11...v2.9.12

v2.9.11: Turborepo v2.9.11

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.10...v2.9.11

v2.9.10: Turborepo v2.9.10

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.9...v2.9.10

v2.9.9: Turborepo v2.9.9

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.8...v2.9.9

v2.9.8: Turborepo v2.9.8

Compare Source

What's Changed

@​turbo/repository
Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.7...v2.9.8

v2.9.7: Turborepo v2.9.7

Compare Source

What's Changed

eslint
Examples
Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.6...v2.9.7

v2.9.6: Turborepo v2.9.6

Compare Source

What's Changed

create-turbo
Examples
Changelog

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge June 9, 2026 01:11
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 11, 2026 4:07pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 11, 2026 4:07pm
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 11, 2026 4:07pm

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Large Turborepo minor-line jump affects all monorepo task orchestration and caching; diff is one pin but runtime behavior may change.

Overview
Bumps the mise-managed Turborepo CLI (npm:turbo) from 2.6.3 to 2.9.16 in .config/mise/config.toml, so local dev and mise tasks that invoke turbo (e.g. lint/fix/doc wrappers) use the newer binary.

This is a Renovate tooling-only change; no application source or turbo.json config is modified in the diff. The upstream 2.9.x line includes security hardening, cache/prune fixes, and auth/process behavior changes compared to 2.6.x—worth a quick smoke run of common turbo tasks after merge.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d6ae07e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jun 9, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.13%. Comparing base (e0c0304) to head (d6ae07e).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8844   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.13%   59.13%           
=======================================
  Files        1346     1346           
  Lines      130105   130105           
  Branches     5882     5882           
=======================================
+ Hits        76938    76939    +1     
+ Misses      52261    52260    -1     
  Partials      906      906
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.19% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.26% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 79.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 75.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 87.05% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.18%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64] 170 ns 140.8 ns +20.71%
⚡ bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200] 215 ns 185.8 ns +15.7%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing deps/tool/turbo-monorepo (d6ae07e) with main (a7f5460)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (29391f0) during the generation of this report, so a7f5460 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/turbo-monorepo branch from 59c8ccf to 5238eba Compare June 9, 2026 23:06
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.14 Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.15 Jun 9, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/turbo-monorepo branch from 5238eba to d6ae07e Compare June 11, 2026 15:55
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.15 Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.16 Jun 11, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$38.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.576 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.92 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.639 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$49.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$40.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$56.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$48.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$87.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$290 \mathrm{ms} \pm 895 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$32.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$95.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 488 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 556 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.93 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 644 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 443 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 532 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 542 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.933 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 590 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 568 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$164 \mathrm{ms} \pm 971 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 665 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$497 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@indietyp @TimDiekmann