Fix date timestamps | New Troubleshooting Page#6869
Conversation
Elastic Docs AI PR menuCheck the box to run an AI review for this pull request.
Powered by GitHub Agentic Workflows and docs-actions. For more information, reach out to the docs team. |
🔍 Preview links for changed docs |
✅ Elastic Docs Style Checker (Vale)No issues found on modified lines! The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
|
@stefnestor I'm running the docs review agent on this, but please ignore its comments for now! I will use them in doing my review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Docs review summary
Focus areas
- Style and clarity: Several wording improvements needed. Grammar error on line 90 (who's → whose), tense issues with "is ran" → "is run" on lines 90 and 96.
- Jargon: No problematic jargon found.
- Frontmatter and applies_to: Critical issue -
descriptionfield is empty and must be populated with a user-facing summary. - Content type fit: Title is too generic for a troubleshooting page. Should be problem-focused per troubleshooting guidelines. Structure mostly follows troubleshooting pattern but Investigate section lacks an anchor ID.
- Parent issue satisfaction: Satisfied - the PR generalizes the Support article into a comprehensive troubleshooting guide as requested.
Notes
- The page is well-structured overall with good examples and clear resolution paths.
- Consider whether "Fix date timestamps" is specific enough for users to identify their problem. Troubleshooting pages typically use problem-focused titles like "Performance issues caused by timestamp data quality" or "Searches hit frozen tier unexpectedly".
Generated by Docs review agent for issue #6869 · ● 545.6K
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Stef Nestor <26751266+stefnestor@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@stefnestor fyi I'm just about done with my review, but I still have a few things to check. Please don't commit anything until I'm done, so I can avoid conflict headaches 🙏 |
|
Oh, I'm sorry! You mentioned that & I thought you meant reviewing via UI so thought I was sneaking in before you looked at it. Which was bad thinking of me, sorry for the merge issues! 🙈 |
|
No worries! I typically push directly to your branch :) (but let me know if that ever gets annoying) Anyway, I'm done reviewing. I did quite a bit of rewriting again for clarity, so please take a look before you merge. |
Summary
👋 howdy, team! This generalizes a top Support article Detect, prevent, and clean-up future dates (@timestamp) into a general new troubleshooting guide on how to detect, cleanup, and avoid-impact-from timestamp data quality issues.
Generative AI disclosure