docs(governance): reconcile the EEIP process across authoritative files#42
Open
ucekmez wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(governance): reconcile the EEIP process across authoritative files#42ucekmez wants to merge 1 commit into
ucekmez wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The EEIP lifecycle parameters disagreed across GOVERNANCE.md, EEIP-TEMPLATE.md and EEIP-0001: submission directory (`proposals/`, which does not exist, vs `docs/eeips/` where EEIPs actually live), vote threshold (majority vs EEIP-0001's ≥2/3), and decision-body name (TSC vs "Standards Committee"). Standardize on `docs/eeips/` (GOVERNANCE + EEIP-TEMPLATE), set the Accepted threshold to ≥2/3, and add a note that the core team (the TSC from v1.0, a.k.a. "Standards Committee" in older docs) is the single decision body. Surfaced by the EEP protocol audit (finding GOV-1). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Ugur Cekmez <ucekmez@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Docs-only reconciliation aligning the EEIP lifecycle parameters (submission directory, vote threshold, decision body) across GOVERNANCE.md and docs/EEIP-TEMPLATE.md to match EEIP-0001 and the actual repository layout.
Changes:
- Standardize EEIP submission directory on
docs/eeips/(replacing the nonexistentproposals/). - Set the Accepted threshold to ≥2/3 majority of TSC members.
- Add clarifying note about the core team / TSC / "Standards Committee" being the same decision body across phases.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| GOVERNANCE.md | Updates lifecycle table to use docs/eeips/ and ≥2/3 threshold; adds clarifying note on decision body and directory; minor wording tweak to fast-track paragraph. |
| docs/EEIP-TEMPLATE.md | Updates submission directory reference from proposals/ to docs/eeips/. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The four normative EEIP-lifecycle parameters disagreed across authoritative files:
GOVERNANCE.md+EEIP-TEMPLATE.mdsaidproposals/(which doesn't exist);EEIP-0001and the actual files usedocs/eeips/.Fix
docs/eeips/(GOVERNANCE table + EEIP-TEMPLATE).eep.dev/proposalsis the web mirror ofdocs/eeips/.Docs-only. Surfaced by the EEP protocol audit (finding GOV-1). Touches a
GOVERNANCE.mdregion disjoint from #6's (the 0.x procedure), so the two merge cleanly.🤖 Generated with Claude Code