Skip to content

Add gasless transactions guide to improve developer UX for Base Account smart wallets#1407

Open
cuong510 wants to merge 1 commit into
base:masterfrom
cuong510:add-a-new-guide-in-the-apps
Open

Add gasless transactions guide to improve developer UX for Base Account smart wallets#1407
cuong510 wants to merge 1 commit into
base:masterfrom
cuong510:add-a-new-guide-in-the-apps

Conversation

@cuong510
Copy link
Copy Markdown

What changed? Why?

  • Fits entirely within existing sections (e.g., under apps/guides/ or a relevant base-account integration). No new top-level sections or excessive subsections. Use cross-links to the existing quickstart/build-app guide, Base Account docs, wagmi integration pages, and EIP-5792 capabilities.

  • This is a step-by-step, action-oriented Guide (or Cookbook-style pattern) demonstrating a real-world task. It builds on the happy path from the tally app quickstart (which already touches batching/paymasters) by providing a focused, reusable pattern.

  • Explicit language, complete runnable code (Next.js + wagmi + Base Account), copy-paste ready examples with realistic data, error handling, verification steps, and links. Checklist: An LLM could follow it; engineers can run it as-is.

  • Concise, active voice, second person. H2/H3 headings. Fenced code blocks with filenames. , , , , (e.g., for different wallet types). Images framed with alt text. Consistent terminology (introduce "paymaster" first use).

  • Base emphasizes low fees, smart wallets (Base Account), and great UX for mass adoption. Gasless txns lower barriers (especially for new/onboarded users via Base App/Account). This addresses common dev pain points (gas management, user friction) and ties into existing content on capabilities, batching, and smart accounts. It encourages more dApps to leverage Base-specific features without being overly third-party focused.

@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/2
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 1
Sum 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants