[FLINK-39680][FLINK-21378] Supports unaligned checkpoint on pointwise edges#28523
Open
pltbkd wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
[FLINK-39680][FLINK-21378] Supports unaligned checkpoint on pointwise edges#28523pltbkd wants to merge 7 commits into
pltbkd wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
…with force-unaligned option
…-aware computation helpers
…OrPartitionRescalingDescriptor
… and restore path
…very and demultiplexing
…descriptor generation
Collaborator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the purpose of the change
This PR enables unaligned checkpoint on pointwise edges when users enable it explicitly, as long as handling the channel state recovery of pointwise edges.
The two issues are combined because neither makes sense as an independent change.
Brief change log
Verifying this change
This change is covered by existing unaligned checkpoint IT cases, because the original topologies contain pointwise edges and the jobs are already set FORCE_UNALIGNED.
This change also added an IT case that covers all parallelism and edge pattern changes on pointwise edges.
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
@Public(Evolving): noDocumentation