docs: update violet command reference#765
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis PR updates violet CLI documentation across two files to reflect new authentication mechanisms, expanded command functionality, and improved security guidance. Key changes include adding token-based authentication parameters, substantially expanding the ChangesViolet CLI Documentation Updates
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/en/upgrade/pre-upgrade.mdx (1)
52-58:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winInconsistent password exposure guidance.
The
violet pushexample uses--platform-passwordon the command line, but there's no warning about password exposure in shell history and process listings (unlike theviolet listexample at lines 40-44). The same security concern applies to both commands.Consider adding a similar warning or updating the example to use
--platform-tokenfor consistency.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/en/upgrade/pre-upgrade.mdx` around lines 52 - 58, The example for the violet push command exposes credentials via --platform-password; update the example to either use --platform-token instead of --platform-password (and show a placeholder like "<platform_token>") or add the same security warning present for violet list about avoiding passwords on the command line and preferring tokens or environment variables; change the command snippet (referencing the violet push invocation and the --platform-password flag) and add one short warning sentence directly below the snippet mentioning shell history/process-list exposure and recommending --platform-token or env var usage.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/en/extend/upload_package.mdx (1)
136-142: 💤 Low valueVerify "L4/L5 applications" terminology is clear to users.
Line 136 refers to "L4/L5 applications" but then immediately explains them as ModulePlugin, OperatorBundle, and Chart types. If "L4/L5" is internal or unfamiliar jargon, consider using the concrete type names directly or adding a brief explanation of what L4/L5 means in this context.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/en/extend/upload_package.mdx` around lines 136 - 142, Replace or clarify the ambiguous "L4/L5 applications" phrase in the docs around the `violet list` usage by either removing the L4/L5 shorthand and referring directly to the concrete types (ModulePlugin, OperatorBundle, Chart) or by adding a one-line parenthetical explaining what L4/L5 denotes (e.g., which deployment/extension layer or internal classification) so readers immediately understand the mapping between "L4/L5" and the listed types; update the sentence that currently starts with "When upgrading the platform, use `violet list` to list the L4/L5 applications..." to use the chosen clearer wording.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@docs/en/upgrade/pre-upgrade.mdx`:
- Around line 52-58: The example for the violet push command exposes credentials
via --platform-password; update the example to either use --platform-token
instead of --platform-password (and show a placeholder like "<platform_token>")
or add the same security warning present for violet list about avoiding
passwords on the command line and preferring tokens or environment variables;
change the command snippet (referencing the violet push invocation and the
--platform-password flag) and add one short warning sentence directly below the
snippet mentioning shell history/process-list exposure and recommending
--platform-token or env var usage.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/en/extend/upload_package.mdx`:
- Around line 136-142: Replace or clarify the ambiguous "L4/L5 applications"
phrase in the docs around the `violet list` usage by either removing the L4/L5
shorthand and referring directly to the concrete types (ModulePlugin,
OperatorBundle, Chart) or by adding a one-line parenthetical explaining what
L4/L5 denotes (e.g., which deployment/extension layer or internal
classification) so readers immediately understand the mapping between "L4/L5"
and the listed types; update the sentence that currently starts with "When
upgrading the platform, use `violet list` to list the L4/L5 applications..." to
use the chosen clearer wording.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: dee0e2ad-12b8-481b-ba89-32dcf2eb73ac
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/en/extend/upload_package.mdxdocs/en/upgrade/pre-upgrade.mdx
Document the current violet list and gc behavior and correct push flags so upgrade guidance matches the CLI implementation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Deploying alauda-container-platform with
|
| Latest commit: |
15c2217
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://94267030.alauda-container-platform.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://docs-violet.alauda-container-platform.pages.dev |
|
Review on the violet command reference update. Findings split into P1 (in-scope inconsistency), P2 (structural / AI-usability), P3 (nits), plus a cross-doc follow-up. Author to judge what to act on. P1 —
|
Document the current violet list and gc behavior and correct push flags so upgrade guidance matches the CLI implementation.
Summary by CodeRabbit
violetCLI documentation with new platform-token authentication method.violet listcommand features including installed app exports and cluster filtering.violet pushcommand documentation with new optional flags for advanced deployment control.