Premiermoney patch 1

[Premiermoney]

💡 Motivation and Context

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.

If releasing new changes

• Ran sampo add to generate a changeset file

[greptile-apps]

Prompt To Fix All With AI

Fix the following 2 code review issues. Work through them one at a time, proposing concise fixes.

---

### Issue 1 of 2
default:1-16
**Broken, incomplete code added as a non-Python file**

This file contains syntactically invalid Python fragments and should not be merged. It is missing a `.py` extension (so it cannot be imported), the code is incomplete (unclosed `Client(` constructor calls, a malformed docstring `"""Crglobal...` that is never closed), and the `if default_customer:` on line 2 references an undefined name — the correct variable in `posthog/__init__.py` is `default_client`. None of the referenced names (`api_key`, `host`, `debug`) are in scope. This file appears to be a copy-paste accident rather than an intentional contribution.

### Issue 2 of 2
Semantic/Kernel:1
**Shell command stored as a data file**

This file contains a bare `pip install` command with no extension and no surrounding code or documentation context. It is not a Python module, test, script, or documentation page — it does not belong anywhere in the `posthog-python` repository tree. If the intent was to document an installation step for a Semantic Kernel integration, that belongs in a `README` or docs file, not as a standalone file in a new `Semantic/` directory.

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Initialize default client and proxy func..." | Re-trigger Greptile}

[greptile-apps]

Shell command stored as a data file

This file contains a bare pip install command with no extension and no surrounding code or documentation context. It is not a Python module, test, script, or documentation page — it does not belong anywhere in the posthog-python repository tree. If the intent was to document an installation step for a Semantic Kernel integration, that belongs in a README or docs file, not as a standalone file in a new Semantic/ directory.

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: Semantic/Kernel
Line: 1

Comment:
**Shell command stored as a data file**

This file contains a bare `pip install` command with no extension and no surrounding code or documentation context. It is not a Python module, test, script, or documentation page — it does not belong anywhere in the `posthog-python` repository tree. If the intent was to document an installation step for a Semantic Kernel integration, that belongs in a `README` or docs file, not as a standalone file in a new `Semantic/` directory.

How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!