-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
Add FACE to dims to check in _update_particle_states_position #2688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+26
−2
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does this not throw an ErrorOutOfBounds? Would that not be more similar to how it's done in Sgrid?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The grid search returns a value of
GRID_SEARCH_ERRORon the face index when it's not found in the grid; this is done inspatialhash.query()There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ErrorOutOfBounds is thrown when the search index is
-1GRID_SEARCH_ERROR=-3which triggers this lineThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does the Sgrid return a value of grid index -1, corresponding to
RIGHT_OUT_OF_BOUNDS?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see; I was confused
We use these LEFT and RIGHT only in the 1d_search:
Parcels/src/parcels/_core/index_search.py
Lines 59 to 60 in 481decc
This is especially useful for z/depth, where users may want to distinguish between a particle moving into the air or into the ground. And it just so happens we can also use it on rectilinear grids in the horizontal, because these use 1d_search
On CurviLinear grids, Xgrid would also not be able to disinguish between LEFT and RIGHT. So your test is fine as is