We published our MCP server to the registry on June 18 using the standard
reverse-DNS name format, but our domain (mcp.stackbilt.dev) produces
dev.stackbilt.mcp/gateway — which reads as a development or staging
namespace rather than a production server.
Current listing: dev.stackbilt.mcp/gateway (v1.1.0)
Repository: https://github.com/Stackbilt-dev/stackbilt-mcp-gateway
Remote: https://mcp.stackbilt.dev/mcp (streamable-http)
We'd like to re-publish as stackbilder/mcp-gateway to match our product
name and avoid the staging-namespace confusion. Since the name field is
immutable once published, we're requesting either:
- Deletion of the current
dev.stackbilt.mcp/gateway entry so we can
re-publish with the correct name, or
- Rename to
stackbilder/mcp-gateway if that's supported on your end.
Happy to verify ownership however needed. Thanks for the consideration —
the registry is in preview so flagging this early seems useful for the
name format guidance as well (.dev TLD owners will all hit this).
We published our MCP server to the registry on June 18 using the standard
reverse-DNS name format, but our domain (
mcp.stackbilt.dev) producesdev.stackbilt.mcp/gateway— which reads as a development or stagingnamespace rather than a production server.
Current listing:
dev.stackbilt.mcp/gateway(v1.1.0)Repository: https://github.com/Stackbilt-dev/stackbilt-mcp-gateway
Remote: https://mcp.stackbilt.dev/mcp (streamable-http)
We'd like to re-publish as
stackbilder/mcp-gatewayto match our productname and avoid the staging-namespace confusion. Since the
namefield isimmutable once published, we're requesting either:
dev.stackbilt.mcp/gatewayentry so we canre-publish with the correct name, or
stackbilder/mcp-gatewayif that's supported on your end.Happy to verify ownership however needed. Thanks for the consideration —
the registry is in preview so flagging this early seems useful for the
name format guidance as well (
.devTLD owners will all hit this).